![]() ![]() ![]() This dissensus potentially can create problems with regard to its evaluation. The variety identified amongst informants, indicates how there is a potential dissensus possible regarding what qualitative management research might entail, as well as regarding its provenance and its academic status. The philosophical dimensions of each of these variable definitions are outlined and their relationships to the methodological literature are explored. Interview data from these individuals were analysed though an iterative process using the NVivo software package to inductively generate definitional categories and explore aspects of their interrelationships.įrom data analysis it was apparent that there are eight different, but often interrelated, ways in which interviewees define qualitative management research. 44 individuals who were drawn from four observer‐identified types of “expert” informant who were taken to generally represent key groups of stakeholders in the conduct, evaluation and dissemination of qualitative management research. ![]() ![]() Information was gathered through the use of semi‐structured interviews conducted with. The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of research which explores how the concept qualitative management research is variably constructed and defined by those who have a direct interest in, and influence upon, important aspects of qualitative management research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |